Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Performances of both methods are considered.
Different ways of interpreting the results for both methods are considered and illustrated by examples.
In this paper, both methods are considered.
The 102 transcripts that were common to both methods are considered as high confidence genes with preferential A (88) or P (14) expression.
Although MSSA patients were more likely to undergo breast abscess incision and drainage than their MRSA counterparts, both methods are considered appropriate surgical interventions (14 ).
Although both methods are considered reliable and reproducible for surface density determination, they have not been objectively compared under the same biological conditions.
Similar(53)
Only SNPs called by both methods were considered for the analysis.
Only sites detected using both methods were considered positively selected.
Those not confirmed by both methods were considered indeterminate.
To limit false positives, only sites detected using both methods were considered as positive selection targets.
Following a conservative approach, only genes that were found to be significant using both methods were considered further.
More suggestions(17)
both processes are considered
both approaches are considered
both steps are considered
both players are considered
both methods are summarized
both issues are considered
both levels are considered
both methods are included
both methods are benchmarked
both methods are contrasted
both numbers are considered
both methods are given
both authors are considered
both methods are supported
both methods are depicted
both women are considered
both kicks are considered
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com