Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
It finds that the results from both methods are comparable and the choice of modelling approach influences the results by just 1.4%.
Fatigue data of FU2590 measured with both methods are comparable when presented vs. the normalized maximum stress, i.e. maximum tension stress of a cycle divided by the bending or tensile strength, respectively.
To insure both methods are comparable, the total cost is represented in $/m3.
Energy efficiencies using both methods are comparable whilst the constant-temperature method results in greater exergy efficiency at higher levels of solar radiation.
After more than 4 years of the trial duration it can be concluded that both methods are comparable in terms of technical success rate, safety, and symptomatic efficacy.
Both methods are comparable at low to moderate gap percentages, but diverge thereafter in the accuracy of phylogenetic inference (not shown).
Similar(54)
Zone boundaries determined by both methods were comparable.
Results from both methods were comparable and each method has its own advantages.
More recently, Koutsoukas et al. [10] compared the performance of both the Naïve Bayesian and Parzen-Rosenblatt Window classifiers, concluding that the overall performance of both methods is comparable though differences were found for certain target classes.
It was concluded that both methods were comparable.
Both methods were comparable in the measurement of gait with the Traditional method demonstrating high level of repeatability.
More suggestions(19)
both methods are identical
both procedures are comparable
both measures are comparable
both methods are consistent
both modes are comparable
both methods are equivalent
both methods are robust
both strategies are comparable
both CHMMs are comparable
both platforms are comparable
both fits are comparable
both subgroups are comparable
both matrixes are comparable
both sites are comparable
both units are comparable
both genes are comparable
both cases are comparable
both networks are comparable
both scales are comparable
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com