Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Both methods appear to remove a substantial fraction of the fine adhered particles during boiling in HCl (compare Figure 4A and B).
Both methods appear to agree that extragalactic flares can be, and indeed are, present in the short burst population, although the rate of such events remains uncertain.
Although both methods appear to be viable tools for LES of urban flows, the immersed boundary approach is computationally more efficient.
Thus, both methods appear to satisfy the criterion of not affecting basic biological processes, an important assumption in all studies that use marking techniques, while also differing in other regards.
Both methods appear to perform comparably with respect to conserving the component separation.
The results are shown in Figure 4. Again, both methods appear to have good power across a wide spectrum of parameter values.
Similar(53)
While both methods appeared to be effective, a slightly more accurate result is obtained using the direct ML estimation technique in this case.
Combined use of both methods appears to be a reliable alternative to IVU in the long-term follow-up for patients with SCI with neurogenic bladder dysfunction.
Although USRCAT performed slightly better than ElectroShape in this benchmark, both methods appeared to reach similar limits of what is possible with the USR approach given the properties of DUD-E.
Both methods appeared to be reliable formats (3).
However, with increasing of correlations among genes, both methods appeared to be equivalent.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com