Sentence examples for both measures were statistically from inspiring English sources

Both measures were statistically significantly improved as compared with PBS-treated littermates (Fig. 5).

We find that both measures are statistically indistinguishable for the 2 maps (z-test, P > 0.1 and 0.05, respectively), highlighting the overall similarity of both maps.

We found only one statistically significant association, between the inferior area RNFL thickness and g-speed (p = .049, η = 0.45); all other associations between RNFL measurements and the cognitive measures were statistically non-significant (Table  5).

The mean change improvements from baseline to endpoint in reading comprehension and reading composite measures were statistically significant for both groups, and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups.

All anthropometric measures were statistically correlated to VAT and SAT in both sex groups.

No demographic or disease characteristic variables, including acute severity measures, were statistically significant predictors of outcome.

In our study, none of the group differences on neurocognitive measures were statistically significant.

First, all measures were statistically significantly inter-correlated.

These performance measures were statistically significantly associated with ESS.

All measures were statistically evaluated using SPSS 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

None of the differences between groups in the utilization measures were statistically significant (Table 3).