Sentence examples for both measures were compared from inspiring English sources

The metabolically active tumour volume and SUV TRT (percentage difference and absolute differences) for both measures were compared using those lesions that were detected by both methods.

Both measures were compared before and after the intervention and with the control ward.

To assure the fidelity of GE between clinical examination and study model assessment, both measures were compared using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for 5 subjects, with generalized gingival hyperplasia in at least 3 sites, resulting in an ICC of 0.92.

When both types of measures were compared, a clear correlation was found (R = −81%, P < 0.01).

This approach was chosen to ensure that outcome measures were compared after an equivalent effective playing time in both conditions.

Measures were compared by Tukey's test at 5% (INFOSTAT 2011).

Outcomes for the three measures were compared between groups and correlation between scoring methods was assessed.

Therefore, previously published diversity measures were compared to recently introduced spatial statistics-based figures of dataset topology [2].

Pre- and post-treatment measures were compared separately for the treated and waiting-list groups using matched paired t-tests.

All 3 measures were compared at initial presentation and at a mean follow-up of 5 years.

These measures were compared using repeated measures ANOVAs.