In addition, CCT does not allow for a separation of the evaluated persons and items – these are both interpreted in the context of the other.
In particular, they are both interpreted in the same way that is, the primary subpopulation is one undergoing "normal" fetal development, while the secondary/ residual" subpopulation represents births that were "compromised" during fetal development (7, 14, 15, 17– 19, 25, 28)—for example, by preterm delivery (we did not exclude preterm births).
Both were interpreted in ways that were prejudicial against heterogeneous environments.
One interesting aspect thereby is that attentional benefits (reflected e.g., by a larger P1 for attended as compared to unattended items at contralateral sites) and costs (reflected e.g., by a larger P1 at ipsilateral sites) can both be interpreted in terms of inhibition.
Now interestingly, in fact, both the zero order hold and the linear interpolation, which is often referred to as a first order hold, can also be either implemented or interpreted, both implemented and interpreted, in the context of the equation that we just developed.
In addition to address the cross correlation of the developed models, the illustration of the spatial distribution of porosity predicted by both models is interpreted in the target zone.
Both ancient Chinese documents, interpreted in the 19th century by the German explorer Alexander von Humboldt, and medieval Arabic works record the pre-European knowledge of Karakoram geography.
After correction, trends in both contributions can be interpreted in structural terms with respect to the hydrogen bond inventory or residual ligand motions.
His posing as a liberator of the Greeks from Roman oppression and, later, his encouragement of social revolution in the Greek cities of the province of Asia can only be interpreted, in both cases, as the actions of an opportunist seeking immediate political advantages.
Similar semiannual variations observed in both Dst versions are interpreted in terms of the equinoctial hypothesis and RM effect.
Both findings can be interpreted in terms of a "temporal-ventriloquism" effect [11], that is, the timing of target stimuli (in either the tactile or the visual modality) is systematically influenced by the timing of auditory beeps.
