Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Both increases were statistically significant.
Similar(59)
RQ increased in both groups, and the increases were statistically significant, but findings in the comparison between groups were not significant.
Mean eosinophil increases were statistically significant for both LY2140023 treatment groups in the overall comparison and pairwise versus placebo.
Neither of these increases were statistically significant (p = 0.32 and p = 0.06 respectively).
All these increases were statistically significant.
The variations in the BUN increases were statistically insignificant.
McNemar's test revealed that these increases were statistically significant.
These increases were statistically significant (p < 0.0001), but were not considered clinically relevant.
Although these increases were statistically significant, they occurred in a clinically non-relevant range.
However, these increases were statistically significant only for bromoform (5.27; 95% CI, 1.80 8.75; p = 0.004).
Increases were statistically significant for each of the change concepts (p <.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com