Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(17)
Kazimoglu et al. [1] also determined that there was no difference between both groups with regard to cosmetic evaluation.
Furthermore, there was an agreement among experts in both groups with regard to the low importance of gender differences in the user's poor judgment of social engineering based attacks in SNSs.
Although there was strong support for the attitude statements among both groups with regard to the benefit of computerization to patient care, there was much less support for electronic medical records.
Differences between both groups with regard to causes of death were not significant.
There was no significant difference between both groups with regard to total late complications.
As a result, too much fluid was administered in both groups with regard to the end-points for fluid administration.
Similar(43)
Similarities were seen between both groups with regards to the general acceleration patterns in all three axes.
Chi-square test showed an equal distribution in both groups with regards to the characteristics variables of the sample (p > 0.05).
No significant differences were detected between both groups with regards to bleeding complications and efficacy, as measured by perfusion lung scans, pulmonary angiograms and echocardiograms.
The chi-square test showed an equal distribution in both groups with regards to the characteristics variables of the sample (Table 1) (p > 0.05).
Although the number of articles was limited, a considerable heterogeneity was found between both study groups with regard to study design and patient characteristics.
More suggestions(15)
both questionnaires with regard
both conditions with regard
both defendants with regard
both groups with unilobar
both sessions with regard
both sexes with regard
both foci with regard
both disorders with regard
both groups with marketing
both approaches with regard
both genes with regard
both phytochemicals with regard
both cohorts with regard
both courses with regard
both groups with mood
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com