Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
Moreover, clinical scores increased significantly from hour 12 to day 2 (P = 0.002), and from hour 12 to day 3 (P = 0.002) in both groups, when the development of infection symptoms over time within a treatment group were compared.
However, there was also a slightly larger discrepancy in the aromatic yields for both groups when the loading amount of the Catalyst II held the same.
bPreintervention values were the same in both groups when the baseline value was used as a covariate.
In both groups, when the free flow of non-pulsatile venous blood appeared, the guidewire was advanced with the J-tip directed cephalad.
Between the two target groups, more than 55% of predicted targets were shared by both groups when the number of coregulating miRNA was equal or less than three.
Activation maps from fMRI scans showed an increase of brain activity in the primary visual cortex (P<0.001) of both groups when the images viewed had a Christmas theme compared with the everyday images (fig 2).
Similar(51)
There was a statistically meaningful significance between result of the software development self-efficacy pre-test and post-test scores of both group, When the the post-test and pre-test scores of the differences were compared, whereas a meaningful significance was not found.
When no resistant cases were found in 1 of the 2 groups, we added 0.5 to the numerator and denominator of both groups when estimating the risk, and 0.1 to the numerators and denominators when calculating the variance of the ratio of proportions (13 ).
A statistically significant decrease in visual analog scale score was observed in both groups, when comparing the baseline with the final results.
Within group comparisons indicated overall significant differences for both groups when comparing the scores obtained in the pre and post-test.
Significant differences in the use of analgesics were found in both groups when comparing the baseline and postintervention assessments within the same group (P < 0.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com