Sentence examples for both groups were within from inspiring English sources

In fact, the values for both groups were within the normal range for both Co and Cr.

However, all mean values in both groups were within normal limits both at baseline and after treatment.

In addition, standardized mortality ratios for both groups were within 95% confidence intervals, demonstrating no significant difference between observed mortality and predicted mortality based on APACHE II.

From the cut-off points recommended by the WHO for the adult and elderly population it was found that both groups were within the overweight range (25.0 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30.0 kg/m).

The mean values of traditional CV risk factors in both groups were within normal range [ 14], except for mean value of total cholesterol in control group, and LDL cholesterol in both groups, that were marginally elevated.

Average P-cortisol concentrations during the period of frequent rectal and genital manipulation, in both groups, were within the normal physiological range, as could be expected during oestrus in normal dairy heifers [ 37].

The general academic capacity of both groups was within normal limits, but at the 30th percentile it was lower than the population mean.

As far as TNF- α was concerned, statistically significant difference between groups was identified (PAD group = 1.14 ± 0.45; non-PAD group = 1.04 ± 0.45; t-test: statistics = 2.105, P-value = 0.0360), but this difference has no clinical significance since the values in both groups are within normal range (0.550 2.816 pg/mL).

When comparing both of these groups to 11 children with appropriate pre- and postnatal growth at a mean follow-up of 7.6 years, both groups of growth-restricted children had slightly but significantly lower glomerular filtration rates, measured by inulin clearance, although both groups were still within the normal range for their ages.

Decreased Fbg of IH group also has less clinical value because Fbg of both groups were also within normal range and decreased Fbg is popular for clinical manifestation by multiple trauma and this result (Fbg 181 mg/dL) may not be appropriate to define severe criteria for multiple trauma.

Other non-homologous regions whose R-values were significant for both groups were found within both frontal and temporal regions.