both groups were well

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "both groups were well" is not correct in standard English usage.
It may be intended to convey that both groups were in good health or doing well, but it lacks clarity and context. Example: "After the event, I was pleased to hear that both groups were well and had enjoyed their time together."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

34 human-written examples

RESULTS: Both groups were well matched for age, mitral pathology, ejection fraction, and comorbidity.

Duke University

From the analysis of Fig. 23, we can notice that both groups were well balanced.

Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development

Both groups were well tolerated with artemisinin in dogs through oral administration.

Natural Products and Bioprospecting

We recognise that there were significant differences between the pre- and post-protocol groups with respect to the indications for warfarin, however, patients in both groups were well matched for age, gender and ASA grade.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Both groups were well matched.

Critical Care

Both groups were well matched for age and sex.

BMC Psychiatry

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

26 human-written examples

Both groups were well-matched for age, gender and BMI with the centenarians' offspring.

Aging

Patients in both groups were well-matched for age and sex.

Arthritis Research and Therapy

Both groups were well-nourished, Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) score was > 23.5, and caloric intake was between 2,000 and 2500 kcal per day, and the alimentation had the nutrients requirements (protein, fat, carbohydrate, vitamins and minerals) between Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) measured by 24-h dietary recalls and serum albumin > 35 g/L [ 14, 15].

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Both groups are well ahead of the group that does third best (the third richest decile).

The Guardian

Both groups are well armed but are no match for the Russian air force or ageing, though effective, Syrian cannons and artillery pieces.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing groups, be specific about the aspects in which they are similar or balanced. Instead of saying "both groups were well", specify "both groups were well-matched for age and gender".

Common error

Avoid using vague phrases like "both groups were well" without providing context. Instead, specify what 'well' refers to, such as "well-matched", "well-represented", or "well-nourished".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "both groups were well" functions as a descriptive statement, intending to convey information about the condition or state of two groups. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrase lacks clarity and context and may not adhere to standard English usage.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

79%

Academia

8%

News & Media

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "both groups were well" is used across various contexts, including scientific and academic writing, but it is often considered grammatically questionable, as Ludwig AI points out. It aims to describe the condition of two groups, but lacks specificity, and is vague. More effective alternatives include phrases like "both groups were well-matched", "both groups were similar", or "both groups were comparable", which provide more context. Despite its common usage, clarity can be improved by specifying the aspect of "wellness" or similarity between the groups.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

both groups were in a good state

Uses a more generic 'state' instead of 'well'.

both groups were evenly matched

Emphasizes that the groups were balanced in terms of abilities or qualities.

the control and experimental groups were adequately balanced

Specifically mentions 'balanced', suitable for experimental contexts.

both groups exhibited similar characteristics

Focuses on the similarity in characteristics rather than overall 'wellness'.

the two groups presented no significant differences

Highlights the lack of significant differences between the groups.

both groups had comparable traits

Replaces "well" with an emphasis on comparable traits.

both cohorts demonstrated equal levels of

More formal, focusing on equal levels of specific attributes.

both experimental arms showed consistent results

Focuses on the consistency of results within the groups, common in scientific contexts.

the groups were comparable

Simplifies to a direct comparison of the groups.

the groups were similar

Further simplifies to just stating the similarity.

FAQs

How can I use "both groups were well" in a sentence correctly?

While "both groups were well" isn't grammatically ideal, you can rephrase it for clarity. Instead, try saying "both groups were "both groups were well-matched" for age and gender" or specify other characteristics.

What's a better way to say "both groups were well"?

Alternatives include "both groups were "both groups were similar"", "both groups were "both groups were balanced"", or "both groups were "both groups were comparable"", depending on the context.

Is it more accurate to say "both groups were well-matched" or "both groups were well"?

"Both groups were "both groups were well-matched"" is more accurate because it specifies the aspect in which the groups are similar. "Both groups were well" is vague and doesn't provide enough information.

What does it mean when we say that "both groups were well" in a study?

In a study, saying "both groups were well" usually means that the participants in each group had similar baseline characteristics or that their general condition was satisfactory for the purposes of the study. However, it's better to clarify what 'well' refers to, such as "both groups were well-nourished" or "both groups were well-educated".