Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
Both groups were measured for mental agility, concentration and dexterity.
The offspring of both groups were measured at birth and several times throughout the following year for weight and blood lead concentrations.
A few subjects from both groups were measured each week during the trial period, making any unmeasured time-varying covariates unlikely to be strong confounders.
The induced tumors in both groups were measured by vernier calipers for volume (length × width × 0.5) at the designated time intervals.
Similar(56)
In study 2, the response time for both groups was measured simultaneously, and the mean 2-min discrepancy between two groups in study two may indicate no raise in PS ambulances response time while using TS ambulances at the same time.
Brain activity for both groups was measured after learning under the same testing conditions.
The primary outcome for both groups is measured from the 12 month follow-up survey.
Six months after the structured DTTP (t2), a slight decrease in diabetes knowledge in both groups was measured, but compared to baseline knowledge, was still at a significantly higher level (SGS t0 vs. t2: 7.4 ± 2.3 points vs. 8.4 ± 2.3 points, P = 0.011; standard: 6.8 ± 2.8 points vs. 8.3 ± 2.6 points, P = 0.001).
Finally, a similar number of patients in both study groups were measured using the old and the new DXA equipments.
Daily sedentary and light intensity physical activities for both intervention and control groups were measured using the 7-day Sedentary and Light Intensity Physical Activity Log (7-day SLIPA Log) [ 25].
We will identify randomised trials that have compared patients with hypertension who are self-monitoring blood pressure with those who are not and invite trialists to provide IPD including clinic and/or ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure at baseline and all follow-up points where both intervention and control groups were measured.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com