Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
Our results show that concepts developed by both groups were generally suitable examples of wheelchair-controlled motion-based video games, but we observed differences regarding level of detail of game concepts, and ideas of disability.
Both groups were generally similar, with the notable exception of percentage of patients on fluid restriction at trial beginning.
We therefore conclude that healthy controls as well as patients in both groups were generally less affected by psychophysiological arousal during the second measurement time.
Both groups were generally positive about their interactions with one another, whilst being aware of discriminatory practices within the health care system.
While both groups were generally satisfied, the faculty were significantly more satisfied with career choice and also felt more stress than expected compared to the residents.
We found that the mean preoperative PSQI scores of the two groups were more than seven points in this study, indicating that the preoperative sleep quality of the participants in both groups were generally poor.
Similar(52)
Both groups are generally confident in their ability to use library resources and report that they have successfully used the library and/or the library website to find research articles and books for class assignments.
The cognitive performance of both groups is generally age appropriate, consistent with previous reports (3, 11) (Fig. 1 A ).
The pain intensity on the visual analogue scale in both groups was generally high with mean values of about 60 mm in both groups.
The mortality levels and trends in both groups are generally comparable, but the early years of local ART availability are an important exception.
The findings indicate that the patients in both the control and intervention groups were generally feeling okay (mean scores 5.6 and 4.9, respectively) at the end of the pre-intervention period in which all patient were on a thickened modified diet for three days.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com