Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(24)
Thirty days after SC injury, both groups were evaluated for motor recovery.
Children in both groups were evaluated twice a week for 3 weeks.
To measure the improvement in the video game abilities of the two training types, both groups were evaluated before every training session on a single mini-game ("Bunnies Don't Like Being Disturbed on Holiday" for the AVG and "Bunnies Don't Give Gifts" for the NAVG training).
Both groups were evaluated searching for associated factors that could lead to infection.
Both groups were evaluated before starting treatment (T0), after 3 (T1) and 7 weeks (T2).
During their ICU stay, patients in both groups were evaluated by the nursing staff using the RASS and the CIWA-Ar scale (either every 2 h or prior to rescue therapy).
Similar(36)
Alcohol consumption in both groups was evaluated using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scale (31).
Next, the use of all categories of outpatient service in both groups was evaluated.
The morphology of the resected tumours in both groups was evaluated by assessing tumour differentiation, necrosis and apoptosis.
Correlation of total scores in GSI, BDI and HDRS with HAQ-DI in both groups was evaluated using Pearson's correlation.
The percentage positive of the total tidal impedance change during each PEEP step between both groups was evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test.
More suggestions(19)
both groups were calculated
both groups were analyzed
both groups were investigated
both groups were assessed
both populations were evaluated
both series were evaluated
both devices were evaluated
both configurations were evaluated
both electrodes were evaluated
both concepts were evaluated
both shoulders were evaluated
both MPs were evaluated
both nanoparticles were evaluated
both cohorts were evaluated
both arms were evaluated
both groups were given
both sides were evaluated
both factories were evaluated
both groups were retested
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com