Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
Both groups were divided into two.
Both groups were divided in three subgroups that were sacrificed after 3, 6 and 12 weeks.
Both groups were divided into subgroups according to the existence of hyperbilirubinaemia (HYB).
Both groups were divided ino two subgroups depending on suture material used (multifilament or monofilament suture material).
Both groups were divided into two subgroups in order to assess the relationship between the extent of the dentofacial deviations and the severity of the orthopedic disease.
Both groups were divided into two sub-groups each based on the susceptibility results of the pre-treatment M. tuberculosis isolates, and were compared (Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2).
Similar(52)
At day 21 after bleomycin challenge, mice in both sensitization groups were divided into the following treatment groups: saline alone, saline +200 ng/dose, 500 ng/dose, and 1000 ng/dose of IL13-PE.
Both cohort groups were divided among the patient age ranges of 2 – 4, 5 – 7, 8 – 12, and 13 – 18 years of age, consistent with previous PedsQL™ age groupings.
To perform a more detailed evaluation of radiological progression at 12 months patients in both treated groups were divided into subgroups of clinical non-responder and clinical responder patients.
Both study groups were divided according to the cut-off point of the QUICKI index (≥0.357 and <0.357; Table 5) in order to determine the relationship among IS, β-cell function, and presence of metabolic syndrome.
Both the TBFM and SAFM groups were divided into subgroups A and B according to degree of maxillary protraction.
More suggestions(15)
both groups were distinguished
both groups were disconnected
both groups were observed
both groups were found
both groups were subjected
both groups were used
both groups were tested
both groups were shown
both groups were exposed
both groups were fed
both groups were followed
both groups were satisfied
both groups were allowed
both groups were sacrificed
both groups were collected
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com