Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(16)
The initial traits of the subjects in both groups were considered comparable (Table 1).
Indeed, both groups were considered for their specific expertise on children, as main responsible adults in children's two primary arenas: home and school.
Therefore, both groups were considered identical and were pooled to form a single control group (Control).
Both groups were considered homogeneous at baseline.
Both groups were considered in the same way.
In this analysis, all 20 animals in both groups were considered.
Similar(44)
Both groups are considered subfamilies of the family Paridae (order Passeriformes) in some classifications.
Thus the baseline level of knowledge of both groups was considered to be equal.
This difference was further accentuated when only female population of both groups was considered, (p=0,03), (Table 4).
Because of limited power for subgroup analyses, we combined A1/A2 and A2/A2 genotypes, as both groups are considered putative high-risk groups.
Inclusion of both groups was considered crucial to obtain individuals' perceptions, and information on interactions and on organizational levels of primary care practices.
More suggestions(16)
both panels were considered
both groups were at
both groups were in
both classes were considered
both soldiers were considered
both neurons were considered
both models were considered
both tests were considered
both stores were considered
both groups were given
both replicates were considered
both clubs were considered
both groups were retested
both mice were considered
both works were considered
both designers were considered
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com