Sentence examples for both groups were allocated from inspiring English sources

Seventy-five ofthem them (43 females, 32 males mean age 42.3 ±3.8SD) volunteered a treatment based on outcomes of Observation 1. Volunteers were randomly divided in group A and Group B. Both groups were allocated to a nurturing approach aimed to counteract fear-rage/despair.

Through this method of randomization both groups were allocated 49 participants each.

Where HPV and p16 were both available, groups were allocated as HPV+ve/p16+ve (77), HPV+ve/p16−ve (56) and HPV−ve/p16−ve (47).

The experimental groups were allocated randomly, and no blinding was done during allocation.

At the start of each period, new areas were fenced off and groups were allocated to a new treatment.

From January 2004 to May 2005, six groups were allocated to GCBT + EX (n = 38) and five to GCBT + ED (n = 36).

Significant differences among groups were allocated by post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) multiple comparison analysis at a = 0.05.

Intervention and control groups were allocated purposively.

The control groups were allocated to usual care.

Focus groups were allocated one hour for completion.

The diagnostic groups were allocated to laboratories proportionately.