Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
In both groups we included women with an intrapartum death.
As there were late infections based on ulcerations of the galea in both groups, we included both patients in the statistical analysis, otherwise the total infection rate would be incorrectly too low.
Similar(58)
We cloned the PCR products from sexual (5 individuals) and fissiparous individuals, within the latter group we included both specimens who showed double peaks in the sequences obtained directly from the PCR product (11) and some that did not show this pattern (5).
Using baseline characteristics available for both groups, we determined that persons not included in the analysis were similar to those that were.
For both groups, we collected the same baseline characteristics including the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II at the day of admission.
Finally, for both groups we calculated measures of claim outcome, including total cost per claim, total cost of weekly compensation (i.e., income replacement benefits), total costs of medical services and number of days of income replacement paid.
As we had to assign participating GPs to either the intervention or the control condition without randomization, we carefully compared both groups and included significant between-group differences on background characteristics as covariates in the subsequent analyses.
We included both groups in the model and included a group × time interaction to determine whether there were significant differences in healthcare-seeking behaviors between the two iCCM models.
When a study included more than one intervention group with a single comparator arm, we included both intervention groups and split the number of patients in the common comparator arm across the separate intervention arms.
Finally, we included two groups of patients.
Both groups included smokers and non-smokers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com