Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The mean BMI for both groups was identical (30.5 kg/m2).
The fact that average litter size of both groups was identical implies that the reproductive capacity of mice is not markedly affected by the deletion of the β4 gene.
Except for the administration of rhAPC, the treatment of patients in both groups was identical.
General care of the patients in both groups was identical and involved clinical and biochemical assessment at 3-month intervals.
AR expression was higher in ER-positive cases compared with ER-negative cases (mean 78.6±1.5%5% vs. 51.8 ± 3.9%, P < 0.0001; Fig. 1C), although the range of immunostaining in both groups was identical (0 99%).
Basic TPN support for both groups was identical: StructoKabiven (Fresenius Kabi España), with a caloric intake of 28 kcal kg-1 d-1 and the following distribution of macronutrients: 0.28 g kg-1 d-1 of nitrogen, 3.5 g kg-1 d-1 of glucose and 1.08 g kg-1 d-1 of lipids, in addition to standard vitamins and trace elements.
Similar(53)
Study results indicated the pretest average scores for both groups were identical.
Outcomes in both groups were identical.
Both groups were identical in age, sex and APACHE II score.
Both groups were identical by sex, age, time of operative intervention, methods of intensive therapy and severity of state.
Since the remaining questions in both groups were identical, the comparison between the groups is still valid but reduces the comparability with other series.
More suggestions(19)
both groups was unchanged
both groups was similar
both groups was equal
both groups was comparable
both groups was exactly
both groups recorded identical
both studies was identical
both enzymes was identical
both calves was identical
both compounds was identical
both maps was identical
both fosmids was identical
both groups was negligible
both cohorts was identical
both mice was identical
both groups showed identical
both scenes was identical
both groups were identical
both groups had identical
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com