Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(17)
No difference between both groups was found regarding microcirculatory parameters in the sublingual area.
From the analysis of the risk reclassification again no significant difference between both groups was found.
Convenience sampling in both groups was found appropriate to find variations of the phenomena.
A significant difference between both groups was found for the triage code.
According to the GOS scores one year after injury, significant difference in overall neurological outcomes between both groups was found.
Interestingly, when the same analysis was pursued for the more traditional POM rating form no significant difference between both groups was found.
Similar(43)
Because lichens and mosses are dispersed by airborne spores that can travel long distances, many species of both groups are found across the entire circumpolar taiga.
The mean description length for both groups are found.
The most common cause of admission into ICU in both groups were found to be trauma.
However, no significant differences in clinical and microbiological outcomes between both groups were found.
Both groups were found to converge in certain representations they ascribed to Yushan.
More suggestions(15)
both reactions was found
both studies was found
both compounds was found
both variables was found
both peptides was found
both tracers was found
both cases was found
both treatments was found
both miRNAs was found
both groups was calculated
both groups was normalized
both genders was found
both varieties was found
both sides was found
both structures was found
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com