Sentence examples for both groups was evaluated from inspiring English sources

Alcohol consumption in both groups was evaluated using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scale (31).

Next, the use of all categories of outpatient service in both groups was evaluated.

The morphology of the resected tumours in both groups was evaluated by assessing tumour differentiation, necrosis and apoptosis.

Correlation of total scores in GSI, BDI and HDRS with HAQ-DI in both groups was evaluated using Pearson's correlation.

The percentage positive of the total tidal impedance change during each PEEP step between both groups was evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test.

Notably, significant improvement in the mean difference in pre- and post-test scores of both groups was evaluated by z test (z = 15.74, P < 0.001), demonstrating the effectiveness of POPS teaching (P < 0.001) (Table  2).

Thirty days after SC injury, both groups were evaluated for motor recovery.

Children in both groups were evaluated twice a week for 3 weeks.

To measure the improvement in the video game abilities of the two training types, both groups were evaluated before every training session on a single mini-game ("Bunnies Don't Like Being Disturbed on Holiday" for the AVG and "Bunnies Don't Give Gifts" for the NAVG training).

Both groups were evaluated searching for associated factors that could lead to infection.

Both groups were evaluated before starting treatment (T0), after 3 (T1) and 7 weeks (T2).