Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
At the beginning of the study (day 1 and day 2) the rating of the patients in both groups was comparable.
The distribution of participants in both groups was comparable.
The overall plastic deformation in both groups was comparable.
SES for both groups was comparable with the Australian population mean of 4.1 (SD 1.1) (20).
The first successful attempt for the gastric tube insertion in both groups was comparable (p = 0.431).
The activity index in both groups was comparable, and showed a dominance of the masseter muscles.
Similar(50)
Group M had significantly higher systemic arterial pressures and systemic vascular resistances compared with group D; otherwise, the hemodynamics in both groups were comparable.
Both groups were comparable in age, sex and severity scale.
Results: Baseline characteristics in both groups were comparable.
Demographics and sensitization history of both groups were comparable.
Both groups were comparable for all baseline characteristics.
More suggestions(15)
both sites was comparable
both groups showed comparable
both groups reported comparable
both groups revealed comparable
both groups was negligible
both concentrations was comparable
both approaches was comparable
both regimens was comparable
both groups displayed comparable
both groups experienced comparable
both viruses was comparable
both groups expressed comparable
both experiments was comparable
both groups yielded comparable
both vaccines was comparable
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com