Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
A second factor that might have added to the variance in both groups was age.
Similar(59)
Both groups were age and sex matched.
Although both groups were age and gender matched, this difference in the mean baseline NRS scores between the two groups clearly shows that they were not matched for all factors.
All the subjects in both groups were age, & ethnicity matched.
Nearly half of patients in both groups were age 65 years or older.
The mothers from both groups were age, educational level, and socioeconomically matched.
The majority of subjects in both groups were age ranging between 18 and 30 years, as shown in Tables 1 and 2.
The exclusion criteria for both groups were age less than 15 years, the presence of an opportunistic infection or a known chronic illness like diabetes mellitus and hypertension.
The exclusion criteria for both groups were; Age ≥ 45 (to exclude age related changing) Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with Snellen chart < 1.0 (in decimals, any level of visual impairment was excluded) Having spherical or cylindrical refractive error ≥ 2D Having any ocular disease that could affect the RNFL thickness (glaucoma etc).
The patients in both groups were aged 17 91 years.
Or over 40%% of both groups were aged between 12 and 24 months.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com