Sentence examples for both groups significantly improved from inspiring English sources

While post-treatment WOMAC scores in both groups significantly improved compared to before the infiltration, the improvement was more significant in the P-PRP-treated group than the HA group at each time point.

At week 4, both groups significantly improved their timed drill test scores.

After three months of cognitive training, both groups significantly improved their speed of processing and visual attention.

In addition, in the present study both groups significantly improved in headache-related disability measures (MIDAS and HIT-6), and reduced their intake of acute headache medication, although it cannot be determined if this is due to the placebo effect or due to stimulation effects in both groups.

Both groups significantly improved their scores with practice and no difference was observed between groups on the last day.

Both groups significantly improved their fasting blood glucose without any significant change in body weight after 12 months.

Students in both treatment groups significantly improved; however, there was no significant difference in learning between the EvoBeaker and the Great Clade Race groups.

Participants from both training groups significantly improved their visual attention performance, resulting in a shorter interval presentation of the target to which they reacted accurately 75%% of the time after training at: i) the speed of processing sub-test (reduction of 28%%), ii) the divided attention subtest (reduction of 33%%), and iii) the selective attention sub-test (reduction of 14%%).

Disability levels in both the NSE and NSEB groups significantly improved (NDI, P<0.01/<0.001) over time with no improvement observed for the PPA group.

Comparison of T1 and T2 accuracy revealed a practice effect, such that both training and control groups significantly improved their WM accuracy (main effect of time: F 1,28)  = 17.84, p<0.001), whereas no training effect was observed, i.e., no significant difference between the groups (no time by group interaction: F 1,28)  = 0.35, p = 0.56) (Fig. 3).

The FTA of the varus and valgus knee groups significantly improved compared with pre-operative measurements (p < 0.001 for both).