Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Both groups showed low percentage of hand washing practice before touching the babies.
Almost 40% in both groups showed low disease activity after 18 months of treatment.
The majority in both groups showed low dependency according to the Katz index of ADL (Table 1).
Generally, both groups showed low or negligible β-values for ERG probes, with values varying, on average, by a two-fold factor for the other genes.
Even though both groups showed low percentages of belief of being exposed during the sham exposure period, they also showed low percentages during the real exposure period.
Caorsi and colleagues [ 29] present no data on the TNF- α level; they state that both groups showed low levels throughout the entire study; however, the detection limit of their technique was 10 pg/ml which is significantly higher than the detection limit in other included studies.
Similar(54)
This is further confirmed by a comparison of MIP-1α/CCL3 levels in HIV-1 positive but S. haematobium negative compared to HIV-1 negative and S. haematobium negative, both groups showing low levels of MIP-1α/CCL3.
Not surprisingly, high school students across the U.S. and across different ethnic and socioeconomic groups showed low levels of understanding of evolution on the pretest.
The healthy control and diabetic groups showed low expression of the sealing claudin-1 and high levels of occludin tight junction related transmembrane protein compared to the L. johnsonii fed group (Fig. 4B).
All three groups showed low QOL scores when compared to populational studies (expected score above 0.78).
All three groups showed low mother adolescent agreement regarding maternal warmth and support (r = .24 to.24).24
More suggestions(15)
both groups showed stable
both groups exhibited low
both questionnaires showed low
both groups showed good
both clades showed low
both groups showed positive
both groups were low
both groups had low
both genders showed low
both groups showed gradual
both atmospheres showed low
both groups showed robust
both extracts showed low
both groups showed significant
both groups showed progressive
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com