Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Both groups scored about the same on the recognition and categorization tasks, showing their methods were equally effective in identifying faces, Caldara notes.
Similar(59)
On the other hand, both groups scored equally on writing scores.
The control group scored about the same as the Norwegian normative values for both the physical and mental component summary scales of the SF-36.
Both groups also scored high in spirituality and maturity.
Both groups had about equal scores on VSTM.
The MoA group scored lowest in both the TIQ and VIQ.
In both these cases, the low-involvement group scored higher.
The post-test group scored lower on both variables.
Furthermore, as to the two subgroups of short stature group, HtSDS < −3 group scored lower than −3 < HtSDS < −2 group about 5 points in every dimension, which concluded the status of Qol correlated to the stage of disease [ 6, 16].
Despite the significant improvements in ACQ score in both groups, only about a fifth achieved the well controlled threshold of ACQ=0.75.
Language comprehension and non-verbal IQ-scores in both groups improved by about the same amount.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com