Sentence examples for both groups of septic from inspiring English sources

(PDF 210 KB) 40635_2014_20_MOESM6_ESM.pdf Additional file 6: Figure S2.: Comparison of gene expression patterns of the 142 probe sets differentially expressed (FDR <0.05) between both groups of septic shock patients.

(A) Heat map of 142 probe sets whose expression was (i) greater than or equal to twofold different (FDR <0.05) when comparing healthy volunteers with SAPSII-low (Low) or SAPSII-high (High) groups and (ii) also significantly different (FDR <0.05) between both groups of septic shock patients.

Both groups of septic rats appeared ill as demonstrated by exudates around nose and eyes, tachypnea and decreased spontaneous movement.

Furthermore, the percentage of CD19+CD69+ PBMCs was elevated in both groups of septic shock patients at ICU admission and during the 28 days of follow-up.

There were no differences in the percentage of circulating CD5+CD19+ cells between both groups of septic patients and healthy donors at baseline and during the follow-up.

The dIVC% showed similar trend in both groups of septic shock (SS) and trauma shock (TS) patients before and after fluid therapy: dIVC% 27% in SS and 24% in TS before fluid therapy; 15% in SS and 11% in TS after therapy.

Coagulation profiles as assessed by TEG showed a hypercoagulability in both groups of the included septic patients at baseline (Table 2).

By day three, both Treg numbers and percentages progressively increased in both groups of patients, especially the septic ones, although there was no statistical difference between the two groups of patients.

Under such conditions, our results could not be extrapolated to other groups of septic patients.

Our experiment in minipigs was designed to compare responses to sepsis between experimental groups of septic minipigs with and without immunosuppression.

DZOase activities were not statistically different between these groups of septic patients.