Sentence examples for both groups of facilities from inspiring English sources

Overall composite scores derived from our observations of consultations for postnatal care process attributes were generally low for both groups of facilities, with lower scores in voucher facilities, where 14.2 out of the 55 elements were demonstrated compared to 16.4 in non-voucher facilities, p = 0.0001 (Table  5).

The specificity of these questions necessitates focusing on one nuclear facility or groups of facilities even if quantifying exposures and responses in neighboring populations is difficult.

The effects in the regression of the supply intervention are not consistent between the two groups of facilities, either in terms of coefficient value or statistical significance.

Interviews with competent residents, however, indicated no difference in the level of toileting assistance provided by staff in the two groups of facilities.

For example, by geocoding all defined health care facilities and following facility-specific CRE counts across time, individual facilities or groups of facilities can be surveyed for statistically significant changes in CRE reporting.

[ 9- 11] Measures of nursing home quality have frequently been proposed and used by researchers in the past, but generally only for a small number of facilities or in select groups of facilities.

The two groups of facilities evinced no significant differences in postnatal care mean process scores: 14.2/55 in voucher facilities versus 16.4/55 in non-voucher facilities; coefficient: -1.70 (-4.9, 1.5), p = 0.294.

Several studies, the majority of which were conducted in individual or small groups of facilities, have recently shown that the rates of MRSA infections decreased following implementation of MRSA prevention strategies [ 10- 15].

Each week 20 eligible clients who have not previously participated in the study will be randomly selected from the electronic medical records of each of the three groups of facilities (60 clients per week in total).

However, as the coefficients and significance of effects attributed to the common supply intervention differed between the two groups of facilities, it is feasible that this assumption would not hold.

This study was a cross-sectional survey and it is therefore not possible to know to what extent there was a difference between the two groups of facilities before the policy change.