Sentence examples for both groups had significant from inspiring English sources

At a mean follow-up of 6.2 years, both groups had significant postoperative improvements in clinical performance, however the difference did not reach statistical significance between both techniques.

Results: Both groups had significant restoration of strength ± standard deviation between T0 and T6 in 30° flexion: non-AFO group 17% ± 15%, AFO group 9% ± 12%.

Both groups had significant and comparable improvements in resting heart rate, blood pressure level, and fitness.

Both groups had significant within group improvements for disability and pain intensity.

As to depressive symptoms, both groups had significant and positive correlations with EC.

Both groups had significant y- and z-translation, while only the asymmetry group had significant z-rotation and x-translation.

Patients in both groups have significant immunoblot reactivity on IgG immunoblot blot analysis, exceeding the highly specific CDC criteria 5 band cut-off for positivity.

AIS and VST are associated with death in 6 16% 12 19 and 3 8% of patients, 15 20 respectively, higher in those with premorbid conditions (figs 3, 4) and in the critically ill, 19 while 40 60% of both groups have significant disability.

At 6 months, both tolcapone groups had significant decreases in levodopa dosage compared with placebo.

However, both treatment groups had significant and similar decrease in urinary albumin excretion, although there was no significant difference in metabolic change during the mono-and combination therapies.

At end point, both treatment groups had significant reductions in glucose profiles across the assessed baseline parameters (Supplementary Fig. 2), with exenatide consistently associated with significantly lower postprandial, but not fasting, glucose levels.