Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(16)
Both groups felt that literature's importance lay primarily not in its social content but rather in its independent creation of language.
Men and women experienced the duration of ACASI as just right (67.1 vs. 62.3%) or too short (11.9 vs. 17.5%), while 20% of both groups felt that ACASI took too long.
Participants in both groups felt that as whiplash patients they were ignored by the medical expertise.
Most participants from both groups felt that the trial fitted into their daily lives.
Over 70% in both groups felt that user involvement was having a strong or slight positive impact.
In those who were not exercising, the vast majority in both groups felt that this was because of fatigue or because they knew it would worsen their symptoms.
Similar(43)
Moreover, nearly two-thirds (65%) of both groups feel that their work interferes with their home and family life.
While both groups understood that children under fifteen are highly suggestible, a smaller proportion of the Reid-trained group felt that way about adolescents, meaning those aged fifteen to seventeen.
The kaumātua group felt that information is best disseminated to places of work, school and family and to Māori health providers to ensure coverage of the Māori population.
Patients of both focus groups felt that all remaining items were relevant and important, and that the length of the PRAQ was acceptable.
Physicians from both the groups felt that increased psychological support for patients in the early stages of the disease may be beneficial.
More suggestions(15)
both groups perceived that
both groups thought that
both groups recommended that
both groups agreed that
both districts felt that
both groups found that
both genders felt that
both reviewers felt that
both cohorts felt that
both companies felt that
both groups demonstrated that
both countries felt that
both women felt that
both sites felt that
both groups concluded that
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com