Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
However, as many as 95% of patients in both groups considered the treatment to be effective, and 89% were interested in receiving the treatments in the future [13].
Both groups considered the patients' wellbeing to be important, and physicians seemed inclined to try to preserve this by offering further chemotherapy, often followed by the patient.
Nevertheless, both groups considered the development of quality criteria would be useful to limit uncontrolled growth of 'medical grey areas' underpinned by only limited 'evidence-base'.
Most of the patients in both groups considered the therapy they received to be very safe (32% home ultraviolet B group v 21% outpatient ultraviolet B group) or safe (52% v 63%).
The results demonstrate that both groups considered the same order of importance of caring, the high ranking of "Monitors and Follows through and "Being Accessible" and the low ranking of "Comforts" and "Trusting Relationships".
Similar(55)
There were no differences in ICU admission days in both groups considering the PEF.
For men and women in both age groups considered, the proportions of survivors to 1991 and 2001 were highest for those who were married in 1971 and lowest for those then widowed or divorced.
Both the survey and the focus groups considered the nature of scientific careers and the circumstances in which scientists currently work and related these things not only to each other but to the nature and quality of research being carried out.
With respect to the final weights for the criteria level, both groups considered "customer service" to be the important factor affecting m-banking effectiveness.
Considered together, both groups considered physicians to be the primary sources of information (52.4%), and there was no significant difference between East and West Coast respondents (p = 0.645).
Both groups considered it an advantage with the change in education that could result in higher status for nurses working in primary health care.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com