Sentence examples for both groups compared with from inspiring English sources

The value of adequate consolidation chemotherapy is confirmed by the comparatively long first remissions in both groups compared with our previous trials, whilst avoidance of maintenance chemotherapy possibly allowed frequent second remissions and similar post-relapse survival in patients from both treatment arms.

Mean NKCA of day 7 decreased in both groups, compared with that at postoperative day 1.

We recruited healthy women non-meditators to live at a resort for 6 days and randomized to either meditation retreat or relaxing on-site, with both groups compared with 'regular meditators' already enrolled in the retreat.

Ruminal NH3N concentration was not different between Ground + AH and Textured groups but was greater for both groups compared with Ground and Pelleted groups.

Ch18 2-OOH Ch18 2-OOHions were significoncentrationsed (P < 0.05) followere 3 h oxidation in both groupsignificantlyth 0 h copper-oxincreasedbut decreased after 4 h.

RBMT scores declined significantly in both groups compared with the original assessment 8 months after cardiac arrest, possibly an effect of ageing-control group: mean (S.D).

Data represent expression values of both dietary groups compared with both dietary groups receiving PCBs.

There were also significantly fewer drug interruptions in both edoxaban groups compared with warfarin (p < 0.001 for both comparisons).

RESULTS: Nausea or vomiting was substantially increased in both meperidine groups compared with the bupivicaine-fentanyl group: 16 with nausea or vomiting in the meperidine groups (n = 21), compared with 1 in the bupivicaine-fentanyl group (n = 11), P = 0.0011.

Oval shapes between circles indicate the number of transcripts that were shared between two time points, i.e., transcripts that were differentially regulated in both treated groups compared with the two respective control groups.

Histologically, there was a trend for decreased cortical thickness in both chemotherapy groups compared with control populations, but these data were not statistically significant (p = 0.06 and 0.12; Table 3, data produced by histological assessment).