Sentence examples for both groups are noted from inspiring English sources

Both groups are noted for their missionary work, particularly in the West and in Africa.

Baseline characteristics of both groups are noted in Table 1.

No statistically significant differences in both groups were noted for pelvic rotation and trunk position in the frontal plane.

With regard to discharge based on patients' wish and physicians' impression (EPs' impression or consultants' opinion) as the main reasons, significant differences in both groups were noted (p<0.001).

Decreased metabolism in both groups was noted in the caudate nucleus, although this signal should be interpreted with caution since these results may be, at least in part, due to ventricular enlargement in CBS patients versus controls.

The lowest scores for both groups were noted at the 2-week time point, but were significantly worse for patients receiving 5-FU/FA compared to those receiving PVI 5-FU (59.3 vs 68.6; P<0.001).

40– 45, 45 Among the three studies that compared the Wii-based program with a different exercise program, Pluchino et al 43 reported no significant improvement in TUG for either treatment group, similar improvements in both groups were noted by Reed-Jones et al 44 and greater improvements in TUG were reported for the group receiving an alternative exercise program in the third study.

Similar differences in levels of agreement between both groups were noted when asked if a follow-up session after conducting RCA would be beneficial (65.3% v 39.4%) and if receiving confidential peer feedback on the RCA report would benefit their learning (83.2% v 37.0%), although significant minorities were unsure in both instances.

No significant differences in the distribution of MCSs between the three socio-cultural groups are noted.

Differences in physical maneuvers between the two groups are noted.

Findings that differ across these groups are noted in the results section.