Sentence examples for both groups and compared from inspiring English sources

Overall performance, however, was poor in both groups and compared unfavourably to overseas studies.

Also, the changes in body weight, functional capacity, and hemodynamic indicators were assessed at baseline and also at the end of each month in both groups and compared.

The clinical response to antifungal therapy was assessed through the SOFA score daily decrease from day 0 to day 3 in both groups and compared by repeated-measures ANOVA.

For the primary outcome, we calculated the point estimate and confidence interval of the difference in cumulative incidence of major flare between both groups, and compared the upper limit of the confidence interval with the non-inferiority margin.

To evaluate the ability of the different graft types to innervate the host striatum relative to that normally provided by the intact system, the density of the TH+ terminal network was assessed in grafted animals from both groups and compared to TH+ fibre density in the intact and lesioned striatum.

Clinical outcomes: mechanical ventilation, ICU stay durations and clinical recovery were assessed along with pharmacokinetic (24-hour AUIC, 12-hour AUIC) and pharmacodynamic (T > MIC and T > 5 MICs) in both groups and compared (chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U-tests).

The increase in the haematocrit compared with the baseline was statistically significant for both groups and comparing the effects of the two groups the weighted mean difference favoured the heater probe (−2.90; 95% CI −5.22 to −0.58).

Mean values and standard deviations were calculated for the scores of level of repair for both the groups and compared using Mann-Whitney U test.

Mean values with standard deviations were calculated for direct and indirect Vv data from both dose groups and compared to literature values (Table 1).

Therefore, the mean and standard deviations for these parameters were calculated for both study groups, and compared using the Independent samples t-test (2-tailed).

One important finding was a significant difference in time taken for symptoms to be relieved on return to a warm environment between both patient groups and compared to the normal population.