Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The main characteristics of cases and controls are summarised in table 1. Males were equally represented in both groups, and cases were 5 months younger than controls (p=0.01).
Similar(59)
The role of alcohol as a perceived cause of suicide had high series level agreement (46.0% in both groups) and case-level agreement (kappa = 0.60), suggesting comparable community and professional views of its significance.
The role of alcohol as a perceived cause of suicide had high series level agreement (46.0% in both groups) and case-level agreement (kappa = 0.60), suggesting comparable community and professional views of its significance.
MBL and FCN2 levels and polymorphisms were measured in both groups, and in cases correlated with clinical data.
The PFS was comparable in the both groups and in this case, the Hazard Ratio was 1.259 955% CI: 0.485, 3.270).
The rate of moderate ketonuria was similar in both groups, and only one case with a high value of ketonuria occurred in the control group.
(We should remark that some authors also consider − | x | + | r | and call this the deficiency of the presentation P.) Remark 1 In both group and monoid cases, if the presentation P in (1) is efficient or inefficient while it is minimal, then it always has a minimal number of generators.
Childbirth in both groups and tuberculosis for the cases in this study were excluded as reasons for hospitalization.
Rates of serious infections requiring hospitalization were low (0.3% etanercept vs 1.2% placebo) in both groups, and no opportunistic infections or cases of tuberculosis were reported.
We compared the direction of methylation of these 121 DMPs from both groups and found that in all cases their direction of methylation was identical.
Sociodemographic characteristics, anthropometric parameters, and levels of daily vitamin intake for both groups (comparison and case groups) are detailed in Table 2.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com