Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
In both groups, a substantial proportion had atherogenic dyslipidemia, hypertension, and albuminuria.
It has to be noted that for both groups, a substantial portion of genes continued to be expressed in mature mycorrhizal roots, primarily in the arbuscule-containing cells [ 30].
The laboratory data during the follow up period is presented for comparison between the two groups (Table 2).In both groups, a substantial number of patients survived without RRT after 1 year (96%).However, over time, the percentage of those who did not receive medical surveillance suffered more death or needed to start RRT compared with those who received medical service (26.3% vs 17.2%,p=0.048).
Similar(57)
For both histologic groups, a substantial fraction of the improvement occurred during the most recent calendar period.
In both canagliflozin groups, a substantial reduction from baseline in HbA1c was observed by week 12, with modest progressive reductions and no apparent plateau observed through week 26.
Both groups experienced a substantial improvement in the outcome parameters at the latest follow-up.
Women in both groups reported a substantial reduction in pain (VAS pain today and last week) in the year after delivery (Table 2), but there were no significant differences between either study groups or subgroups (Table 3).
Both groups found a substantial correlation between these inter-strain distances and their degree of genetic divergence [ 21, 22], which is consistent with accumulations of phenotypic and genotypic differences under poor selection.
Both groups showed substantial improvements in VAS and ODI scores one year after surgical treatment.
Both groups had substantial misconceptions about HIV/AIDS, although FSW had slightly higher scores on average.
Preventable ADE-related and control groups shared a substantial number of patient baseline characteristics (Table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com