Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The linearized transcript levels of the 22 selected genes showed relatively large coefficients of variation (CV, average 44%) among plants for both genotypes, with significant variation among genes: the 95% confidence interval for CV was between 38% to 50%.
Similar(59)
Genotypes with significant differences between the Corpas family and a reference population are shown in Fig. 4.
IIIA/IIIA was the only genotype with significant discrepancy between protective effects compared to the other class III genotypes.
The enrichment analyses showed that more DEGs with down-regulation were involved in "Carbohydrate metabolism" than those with up-regulation at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h in S genotype and all five time points in R genotype, with significant enrichment at 48 h in R and 12 h in S genotype, respectively.
Different apoE genotypes associate with significant variation in plasma lipids profile.
This decrease was preserved across all genotypes with a significant decrease in tau phosphorylation in HFD fed WT animals at the Ser202/Thr205 (p = 0.010) and Thr231 epitopes (p = 0.042) and a trend towards reduction at Ser396 (Figure 4A and 4B).
In this cohort subjects with AxA2 genotype present with significant lower MPV but preserved platelet mass, which might be an indicator of increased platelet consumption, mainly of the larger platelet-subpopulation that present more receptors per platelet [ 23].
Selection favoring genotypes with non-significant (zero) slopes (Additional file 4) could lead to a complete loss of association of body weight with physical activity.
At 1 hr, LC3B-II levels saturated in both genotypes, which correlated with a significant increase in p62 in Ifnb +/+ CNs; however, Ifnb –/– CNs had nearly saturated p62 levels without treatment, and no significant increase was seen with NH4Cl.
RESULTS: We found that compared with the 279QQ genotype, the 279RR genotype was associated with significant elevated risk of lung cancer with metastasis (adjusted OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.03-3.08), whereas the 574PR heterozygote and 574PP homozygote had 1.46-fold (95% CI, 0.94-2.26) and 1.69-fold elevated risk (95% CI, 1.10-2.60), respecompared compared with the 574RR genotype.
We found a range of effects, both beneficial and detrimental, with significant genotype and sex effects.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com