Sentence examples for both genes were determined from inspiring English sources

The spatio-temporal expression patterns of both genes were determined by WMISH of staged embryos.

To verify whether the differences are statistically significant, the expression levels of both genes were determined separately in three male individuals 0 day old from strains H5 and W11.

The putative protein structures of both genes were determined using the open reading frame finder program on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website [ 13], and an open reading frame was identified in the last exon of both genes.

Threshold cycle (Ct) was determined for both target gene and GAPDH for each sample, and relative quantifying of both genes was determined with the 2-DDCt method [ 18].

The efficiency of PCR for both genes was determined by serial dilutions of control cDNA over the range of two orders of magnitude.

By SYBR Green-based real-time (RT -PCR with gene specific pRT -PCRfor Na α-dox1 and Na α-dox2 (for primer specificity see Additional file 3A), transcript accumulation of both genes withdetermined in IR α-dox M and IR α-dox S plants after repeated treatment with M. sexta OS to puncture wounds, a treatment known to strongeneinduce Na α-dox1 transpecificn [ 29].

The PCR condition was set as follow: 95°C for 5 min, 40 cycles at 95°C 15 s and 60 °C 1 min. The Ct Values for both the genes were determined.

Mean read levels for both exons and introns of expressed "ON" genes were determined for both the experimental and randomized datasets and P-values were assigned.

Using the GFF annotation file for P. falciparum 3D7 the start/stop coordinates for each ORF and both upstream and downstream flanking genes were determined.

The RNA levels of relevant immune pathway genes were determined in both larvae and adults by microarray analysis.

Temporal and spatial patterns of expression for all zebrafish CPA genes were determined by both quantitative RT-PCR and in situ hybridization.