Sentence examples for both formula groups from inspiring English sources

Both formula groups had higher IGF-1 concentrations than the breast-fed group at 4 and 9 months of age (P≤0·0001).

Both formula groups were significantly higher than HM group at baseline for WAZ (P=0.008 and P=0.012 for EF and SF, respectively) and head circumference-for-age z-score (P=0.03 and P=0.003 for EF and SF, respectively).

The percent fat absorption (~95 – 97%) from both study formula groups was good and comparable to that reported from HM [ 26].

Both the formula groups had a significantly greater rate of length gain and length-for-age Z-scores compared with that of the HM group.

The mean formula consumption was comparable between the two formula groups both at 6 weeks (177 vs. 178 ml/kg/day, in the HBP and LBP groups, respectively) and at 12 weeks (143 vs. 139 ml/kg/day).

The present study also found lower clostridia counts in both BMOS-supplemented formula groups compared with the control group.

The BF infants had significantly higher stool frequencies (mean no. of stools per day) than the infants in both the HBP and LBP formula groups at both 6 weeks postnatal (3.8, 2.0, and 2.4, respectively, p < 0.05) and 12 weeks postnatal (3.2, 1.6, and 1.4, respectively, p < 0.01).

There were a few infants in both the formula group (7 of 49) and HM group (5 of 18) with 25-OHD values at or below 20 ng/mL.

In general, the plasma essential amino acid concentrations of both the EF and SF formula groups were similar to and within one s.d. of the HM group.

Twelve baboons were divided into three formula groups: Control, with no DHA-ARA; "L", LCPUFA, with 0.33%DHA-0.67%ARA; "L3", LCPUFA, with 1.00%DHA-0.67%ARA.

All parameters of the formula groups were compared to those of the BF group (for reference).