Interobserver agreement was calculated for both methods and for both samples (photographs and radiographs).
This was true for both methods and for all simulation scenarios, as well as for the convergence studies we conducted earlier.
The same data cannot be used both for method training and testing.
The Quest for Orthologs community effort is progressing in many areas of shared interest to research groups in the field, both for method developers and consumers of orthologs.
The histograms of the phrase command relative positions have a very sharp peak at −0.5 s, for both methods and for all corpora analyzed.
In Figure 6 we report the mean confidence level as a function of the edge distance, for both methods and for a single subject (the results obtained with the other subjects are similar, data not shown).
Forward and reverse primers designed with Qiagen® PyroMark Assay Design software were used for both methods, and for pyrosequencing the reverse primer was biotinylated.
The default settings were used for both methods and for the XIP-group alignment analysis, bootstrapping with one thousand replicates for each method assessed the confidence of the best trees.
The parameters are set as λ = 0.003, β = 3, and ρ = 0.1 for both methods and σ = 0.05 for R-SAE.
The difference was largest in line WB (67 days, for both methods) and smallest in line WF (16 days, for both methods).
