Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
Both differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).
Both differences were statistically significant (main effect of Predictability: [F 1,195) = 8.51], p<0.01; main effect of Group: [F 1,195) = 14.69], p<0.01) and confirmed by post hoc tests (p<0.05 between groups and for both the blocked and random conditions).
Both differences were statistically significant.
Both differences were statistically significant (Table 5).
Both differences were statistically significant (p=0.0000001).
Both differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001).
Similar(52)
A two-proportion z-test indicates that both differences are statistically significant (p < 0.001; see Methods).
Interestingly, when comparing the T2*m and T2*s from the whole tendon between volunteers and patients, both mean differences were statistically significant.
In both countries these differences were statistically significant.
On comparing both years the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).
In both cases, the differences were statistically significant with a P < 0.05.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com