Sentence examples for both data sets showed from inspiring English sources

Comparison of the slope values in both centres with framing as the only variable using the same reconstruction method (FBP) and ROI size (Ø 1.6 cm) for both data sets showed a correlation close to the line of unity (Fig. 7).

Comparing the data set from timelines (TL) and the SLR for animals that provided both data sets showed that the SLR data gave higher point estimates on the proportion of time hauled out.

Comparison of the subtypes present in both data sets showed that the Ottenby samples had a higher proportion of mutants than the samples from the NCBI database (Figure 1A).

The Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis of both disease free survival (DFS) and metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in both data sets showed that EZH2 and CDKN1C are consistently associated with the disease outcome in a reverse manner (Table S1).

However, gene ontology analysis by Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) [9] of both data sets showed a clearly improved representation of biological processes linked to the development and progression of DN for the single probe-based approach.

Both data sets showed very similar overall survival curves suggesting that they are generally comparable.

Both data sets show that by increasing the number of features at a fixed -bit quantization per feature pair, the performances of LS + APQ improves and becomes stable.

Both data sets show that mice reared at 17°C before weaning had significantly lowered FM, BW, and adiposity index (AI) (Fig. 1 B, Supplemental Fig. S1 A, and Supplemental Table S1).

In addition, we found little difference in the distribution of pea contig homologs along M. truncatula chromosomes between the two data sets, contigs from both data sets showing even distributions along the chromosomes except for a few M. truncatula chromosomal regions that remained uncovered both by the whole dataset and by the 1920 SNP subset, the largest on chromosomes 1, 3, 6 and 7.

PCA of both data sets show that the first PC was significantly associated with tissue type in both data sets (p < 10−27 for the expression data; p < 10−17 for the DNA methylation data; see Figure 7 and Supplementary file 9), while human and chimpanzee samples are separated by species along PC2 (p = 0.001 for the expression data; p < 10−4 for the methylation data).

Although both data sets show similar concentration gradients from CHCl3 to BDCM as was found for shower air, our CHCl3 and BDCM breath concentrations and the CHCl3:BDCM ratio are markedly lower than the values obtained by Egorov et al. (2003).