Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
Thirdly, we did not set any arbitrary cut off values.
Cut off-values used are given in Table 1.
We analysed our data using both cut-off values, but the results were essentially the same.
5 19 22 28 34 53 Two studies reported the results for both cut-off values.
Hence we selected both cut-off values for dichotomous comparisons to categorise patients into normal or elevated NLR.
In addition, both cut-off values had a high negative predictive value for the development of SSAKI.
While both cut-off values are arbitrary, a BMI > 40 defines morbid obesity and is a more inclusive contributing factor to explain chronic fatigue.
MCA sensitivity with both cut-off values was higher than that of CEA or TPA or CA15.3 (68% vs 10%, 26 %, 32 and 53%and536%, 42%, 32% respectivsly).
A NEMO score ≥6, a GC score ≥3, and a Cs score ≤6 showed the most balanced performance in terms of sensitivity/specificity ratio and the best accuracy in correctly classifying patients with active disease at both cut-off values considered (Table 3).> -wrap-foot> numbernumber of micro-haemorrhages; GC, giant capillaries; Cs, capillaries; ESSG, European Scleroderma Study Group.
Although no significant association was found between the risk of being in the cluster and farm surface when using both cut-off values for this variable (Table 3), results suggest an increased risk for being in the cluster in farms larger than 500 has.
There is therefore a problem of both index choice and cut off value, not forgetting the type of tooth wear registered.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com