Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Second, assuming common coefficients b and c for all stands, both coefficients were significant.
Both coefficients were significant (20q: P < 0.00003, nodal status: P < 0.024).
However, both coefficients were significant or borderline significant, in the same direction, and consistent with a positive association between ALT and PFOA levels.
Similar(57)
In the multiple regression model including number of introns and total intron size both regression coefficients were significant: bnoi = 0.11, N = 1,420, P < 0.00003; btil = 0.21, N = 1,420, P < 10−6.
Both regression coefficients were significant (at P<0.05) in all models tested (i.e. for males and females in the D-probe model, and for females in the depression model), and so were retained in later models that estimated the A, C and E parameters.
The slope coefficients were significant in both equations, but the intercept was only significant in equation (15).
Regression coefficients were significant for both attraction coefficient: 0.65 (t = 5.2, P < 0.0001) and AR: 0.36 (t = 2.9, P < 0.01).
All correlation coefficients were significant in both samples (p ≤.0001), suggesting sample size was not a contributing factor to the significant correlations.
Pairwise correlation coefficients were significant at the *5% or **1% significance level.
All coefficients were significant (z-value >7.32).
The autoregressive coefficients were significant when we estimated EGARCH using normally distributed errors.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com