Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
These results suggest that both ChoREs are required for optimal induction of Txnip expression by adenosine-containing molecules or glucose.
These results suggest that both ChoREs are able to recruit the MondoA/MLX complex, with the proximal ChoRE (ChoRE-a) being a predominant binding site.
As shown (Figure 4A and 4B), when either ChoRE or both ChoREs were mutated, the reporter genes were no longer induced by NAD+.
In this study, we found that the activities of promoters with mutations at either ChoRE or both ChoREs were largely unaffected by siRNAs targeting MondoA or MLX (Figure 5).
To confirm whether both ChoREs are involved in the induction of Txnip expression by glucose or adenosine-containing molecules, we have generated reporter genes driven by Txnip promoters containing mutations at ChoRE-a [37], ChoRE-b or both (dmChoRE, refer to Figure 2C), and tested their response to adenosine-containing molecules or glucose.
For the glucose response test, the activities of promoters with mutated ChoRE-a or with double mutations at both ChoREs were not stimulated by glucose; and as compared with the wild type promoter, the response of the ChoRE-b mutant promoter was significantly reduced (Figure 4C and 4D).
Similar(52)
We conclude that HA-MondoA and Myc-MLX are able to interact with both ChoRE-a and ChoRE-b, and that nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) complex can bind to both the CCAAT and inverted CCAAT boxes, on the Txnip promoter.
Both did chores like mowing lawns and cleaning out furnaces for neighbors.
Since the programme's hours are flexible, students have time for both household chores and classes.
The programme has reached roughly 6,000 girls from deprived rural communities, helping them to attend classes regularly and return home in time to finish both their chores and their studies.
The sequences of both the ChoRE sites on the frog Txnip promoter are moderately degenerate thus lying in between the fishes and mammals (Figure S2, S3, and S4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com