Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
However, as can be seen in Fig. 1, this does not apply to fluorescence-stained conidia together with macrophages for the following reasons: (i) conidia and macrophages are often clustered and attached to each other, (ii) both cell types show variations in their internal and in-between intensities, and (iii) the background is variable [22].
Both cell types show signs of ER stress, but only β cells progress to apoptosis.
The average centre sizes of both cell types show little change within 10° of eccentricity, from where most of our sample comes.
In contrast, transcriptome graphs from leaf tip and leaf base (cells not LCM separated, combined transcripts from both cell types) show all eight exon sequences present.
The control groups for both cell types show similar fluorescence background, which confirms that FITC Cetuximab-Fab exhibits strong and speciFITC Cetuximab-FabR with nexhibitse nonstrongic binding in vitro.
The scores plots of PC1 versus PC2 for both cell types show a very similar distribution, with PC1 separating the reflection spectra from the transmission spectra and PC2 separating the transmission spectra by substrate.
Similar(54)
In an exception to the trend toward slower growth on the 3D substrates, hNSCs differentiated on the CS nanofibers proliferated faster than the 2D controls and both cell types showed enhanced indication of neuronal differentiation on the CS scaffolds.
Both cell types showed the same morphology, antigenic features, and layer distribution described in the three-month old cerebellar cortex.
This suggests that, despite initial differences in apparent phenotype, the polarization became similar following microbial stimulation; both cell types showed the ability to adapt their phenotype.
Both cell types showed an increased phosphorylation of CREB, Erk1/2, c-Jun, and Akt.
Both cell types showed high autophagy flux after treatment with Baf and RAD001 showing approximately 3 7 fold increases.
More suggestions(13)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com