Sentence examples for both cell lines given from inspiring English sources

Notably, TLR4 expression was not different to a significant extent on the cell surface of both cell lines given they were infected with either AdVGFP or AdVαT2ib before (Fig. 6A and 6B middle and right pannels) indicating specificity of αT2ib for TLR2.

Both cell lines gave rise to clones with normal karyotype, but chromosomal aberrations (frequently involving gain of chromosomes 12, 17 or 20) were also observed in a subset of clones derived from both cell lines.

This approach was validated using data from four canine cancer cell lines given 60 different drugs at four different concentrations to generate IC50 values [59].

Fig. 2 Inhibition of Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK-1) reduced the viability of ACC cell lines: Given that PLK-1 is a negative regulator of p53, inhibition of PLK-1 should reduce viability of the ACC cell lines.

This theory would hold true for Jurkat and HeLa cell lines given the data presented within this manuscript, but the data for the remaining three cell lines of nearly equal size requires additional explanation.

We attempted to determine whether HBx proteins were responsible for the activation of STAT3 in our HBx-transgenic mice and cell lines, given by the phosphorylation at Tyr705 [43], [43].

This study focused on the effects of OXY in breast cancer cell lines given that NCI 60 cell line screening data suggested that a subset of these lines was especially sensitive (data available at http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/docs/dtp_search.html).html

These results show that both ER-ve and ER + ve cell lines are responsive to the growth inhibitory effect of activin A. To confirm the decrease in proliferation was occurring in an activin dependent manner in ER-ve cell lines given the controversy in the literature, MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with activin 6000 pg/ml +/− an ALK4/5 inhibitor SB-431-542 (10 μM/l) for 72 hours.

Consistently, more BRs are strongly bound in ABC than in GCB, although BRs with increased STAT3 binding occur surprisingly frequently in the GCB cell lines given their low level of STAT3 expression: 44% of differentially bound BRs (n = 1550) show more STAT3 binding in GCB, whereas 56% (n = 1974) are more strongly bound in ABC.

Both the cell lines gave similar results.

Analysis of the expression of both subunits in cell lines gave similar results (Fig.  1b).