Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Trichostatin A treatment was applied during the last 8 or 24 h), did not influence significantly methylation status of these various promoter sites, indicating that ABCB1 gene modulation, induced by TSA in both cell lines, does not result from alterations in the methylation status of the ABCB1 promoter.
Similar(59)
Below the measured thresholds both cell lines do not show any appreciable effect of the hydrodynamic stress on any critical quality attribute, while above, cells responded negatively to the elevated stress.
Both cell lines do express all four EP prostanoid receptors [ 45].
Both cell lines did not demonstrate an outstanding glucose consumption and production of lactic acid.
Both cell lines did not show significant changes in cell survival after treatment with 400 n M of EX5, compared to control ASO treated cells.
Closer examination of the results from both cell lines did not provide any evidence that there was a substantial enrichment of sites of ASHM in the two cell lines located in close proximity.
Adduct levels were generally lower in HepG2 cells than in MCF-7 cells, although the numbers of adducts in both cell lines did fall within the same order of magnitude.
In Figure 4(A), we show that C4-2B cells have a greater tendency than LNCaP cells to orient themselves towards and interact with AsGM1-coated plates, and that both cell lines do not significantly adhere to GM1-coated wells.
Despite these features characteristic of cancerous cells, both cell lines did not generate progressing tumors mice when different numbers of cells were injected subcutaneously (with or without Matrigel) or orthotopically in the mammary fat pad of either syngeneic mice or nude mice.
The observed loss of SAFB1 in both breast cancer cell lines does not have an effect on ITGB4 mRNA expression whereas loss of SAFB2 and both SAFB proteins significantly increased ITGB4 expression).
However, exogenous expression of TM1 in these cell lines does not alter either cellular morphology or the actin cytoskeleton organisation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com