Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
In both cases, the performance of our method is compared with the asymptotic near capacity design.
In both cases, the performance on the independent test set reveals the actual quality of prediction.
So indeed, in both cases, the "performance indicator" [13] asymptotically stays the same, leading to equivalent code lengths.
In both cases, the performance degrades initially but recovers to give a similar performance to the case where there are no nodes being switched off.
As the angular separation decreases, (mathcal {D}_{text {dm}}) and (mathcal {D}_{text {sm}}) achieve similar IR, due to the fact that in both cases, the performance is limited by the spatial resolution of the array.
We can see that in both cases the performance of the PEC algorithm in terms of maximal embedding capacity is 9.5% and 23.3%, respectively, superior to that of the CW algorithm.
Similar(50)
In both cases the performances were reasonable but lacked the intensity and sweep to make these moments, and the evening in general, really crackle.
In both cases, the performances did not differ from chance and the error rates of subjects were 50%.
In both cases, the biggest performance improvements are obtained with high quality sentence segmentations.
We show that in both cases the same performance figure of merit applies so that common design criteria apply to the neutron detector head.
In both cases, the marked performance improvements from MnO2 NCNT compared favourably to the NCNT and MnO2, which are the constituents of the composite.
More suggestions(16)
both cases the picture
both cases the stress
both cases the logo
both works the performance
both methods the performance
both experiments the performance
both cases the name
both cases the support
both cases the result
both cases the conclusion
both cases the need
both cases the operator
both cases the answer
both cases the market
both cases the culprit
both cases the passenger
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com