Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Both arms were considered.
Trials initially designed to randomly assign patients to surgery, followed by different chemotherapy regimens in both arms, were considered ineligible [ 18, 19].
†Refers to trials showing significant difference between treatment arms for cardiovascular disease end points and populations of both arms were considered in analysis of the biomarker.
When both arms were considered together, ZA administration led to significant decreases of urinary NTX (P<0.001) and serum CTX (P<0.0001) levels, but not of urinary DPD.
Participants in both arms were considered to have a therapeutic INR of 2 3 no more than 50% of the time; the anticoagulation status at the time of an event was not reported.
As far as bone formation markers were concerned, when both arms were considered together, both bone ALP and osteocalcin significantly (P=0.001 for both variables) changed after ZA administration.
Similar(53)
Fifty-three arms were considered as positive or potentially positive.
In 2010, prospects for a treaty on reduction of nuclear arms were considered dim; Republicans were strongly opposed and had little interest in giving Mr. Obama another victory.
Three consecutive choices in three different arms were considered an alteration.
If the rat did not complete a trial (i.e. did not have 3 correct choices or enter 8 arms), the unvisited arms were considered as errors, as well as repeated entrances in an arm.
When the two treatment arms were considered together, reactivation was observed in only 4% (3/70) (RR: 0.1 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.5)).
More suggestions(15)
both tests were considered
both arms were evaluated
both arms were repeated
both spouses were considered
both arms were tested
both events were considered
both arms were immobilized
both works were considered
both strands were considered
both arms were discounted
both antibodies were considered
both conditions were considered
both shows were considered
both arms were supported
both men were considered
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com